Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> I assumed (by default) that the same was true of FOs. There would be some
> sorts of typography that couldn't be tackled this way and that we would
> have to use existing or other systems. I suspect that many people would not
> expect FOs to support the final typography for traditional printed books.
Perhaps it's just me or I missed some discussion, but I wasn't under that
impression at all.
> Anyway, at least we seem agreed that activity in this area is valuable,
> even if the challenges are very difficult.
Perhaps I haven't been clear - I'm not at all certain that they're valuable. I
can see some benefit in FO, but I have yet to be convinced that on balance, it's
a worthwhile endeavour.
--
Regards,
Marcus Carr email: mrc@a...
___________________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
- Einstein
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
