• From: "Gregg Reynolds" <greynolds@g...>
• To: "'Ram Mareddy'" <rmareddy@s...>
• Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:23:53 -0500

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xml-dev@x... [mailto:owner-xml-dev@x...]On Behalf Of
> Ram Mareddy
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 5:50 PM
> To: 'Dan Mabbutt'; Bob Kline
> Cc: XML Developers List
> Subject: RE: British Telecom owns Hyperlink?
>
> has flared quicker than hooligans rioting after a game of basketball.
>

Now that's what I call cognitive dissonance.  "Basketball hooligans"; what a
hilarious concept!  Almost as funny as the US Patent Office.

But is BT's claim any more ridiculous than many other patently absurd claims
of a similar nature?  E.g. Microsoft's stylesheet patent, Amazon's
one-click, etc. etc.  In the face of such blatant legal stupidity (or is
"chicanery" more accurate?), does it not become the honest citizen's
responsibility to break the law?


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: British Telecom owns Hyperlink?
    • From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>

• References:
  • RE: British Telecom owns Hyperlink?
    • From: "Ram Mareddy" <rmareddy@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Introduction and a few questions
• Next by Date: Re: British Telecom owns Hyperlink?
• Previous by thread: RE: British Telecom owns Hyperlink?
• Next by thread: Re: British Telecom owns Hyperlink?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread