• From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)
• To: xml-dev@X...
• Date: 19 May 2000 17:11:32 GMT

I think I have to withdraw my claim that yacc can directly handle the
NotationDecl production.  My claim was based on having tried it, but I
hadn't included the S non-terminals - whitespace was being consumed by
the lexer.  When I put the S's in, I get a shift/reduce conflict.

-- Richard
-- 
Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers.

"The Internet is really just a series of bottlenecks joined by high
speed networks." - Sam Wilson

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
    • From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)

• Prev by Date: Re: Irony heaped on irony
• Next by Date: Re: Requirements for semantic web
• Previous by thread: Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
• Next by thread: Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread