• From: Oliver Becker <obecker@i...>
• To: xml-dev@X...
• Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 18:23:10 +0200 (MET DST)

Hello,

I recently found an article which makes me wondering:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2574350,00.html

Citation:
"W3C accepts VoiceXML 1.0 spec
 The World Wide Web Consortium accepts the Voice Extensible Markup 
 Language specification, expanding 'voice enabling' Web content and 
 services."
 
Is this just another journalistic overstatement or did I miss something?

There is a W3C note, dated 05-05-2000 - but that can hardly be
characterized as acceptance.

Cheers,
Oliver

 
/-------------------------------------------------------------------\
|  ob|do        Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker                             |
|  --+--        E-Mail: obecker@i...             |
|  op|qo        WWW:    http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker |
\-------------------------------------------------------------------/


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: VoiceXML news
    • From: Philip Allen <plega@d...>
  • W3C Notes (was Re: VoiceXML news)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Databases Serving and SPITTING UP XML
• Next by Date: W3C Notes (was Re: VoiceXML news)
• Previous by thread: soap.weblogs.com updating again
• Next by thread: W3C Notes (was Re: VoiceXML news)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread