Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Mon, 29 May 2000 10:37:02 David Megginson wrote: > I'm actually posting this as a cautionary tale, because Tim arrives > unprepared and gets badly whumped in the debate (at least, it looks that > way reading the transcript; it's probably even worse in the RealAudio > version). The audio version is no better. Tod draws a line in the sand between the PTO's responsibility and the responsibilities of US congress and is very effective in getting the point across. > If we're going to carry on this debate in any meaningful way, > we're going to have to come much better prepared, and this debate shows > very clearly where we need to collect a lot of good, credible evidence > to back up our claims. Indeed. And this material must be sent to the US patent office by the truck load :-/ how will the software industry fund such prior-art challenges and lodgements? Andrew Cassin acassin@c... *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
