Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> Dan Connolly: > > David Megginson: > > Please remove the schema from http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace and > > put it somewhere else, then update the schema for schemas to follow > > this (better) practice. This also has the advantage that users can > > refer to the specific version of the xml: schema that they want to use. > > Hmm... issuing an address for each specific version of the schema > spec that we put on the web server is a reasonable idea, but > removing the schema from http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace > removes the ability to use namespaces in schemas in the most > straightforward way. In my opinion, the best solution would be to remove the confusing http:// from the namespace name. However, at least you should append /xml-schema when translating a namespace name into an XML Schema URL. Otherwise, an XML Schema can collide with e.g. an RDF schema describing the same language. > I think that on the contrary, it's important that the schema spec > leads the way toward the self-describing web. I think most of us just need some nice DTD replacement including packaging. Why don't you try a layered approach and build more advanced features later on top of something more simple? Best, Stefan. -- Stefan Haustein University of Dortmund Computer Science VIII www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
