• From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 13:17:48 +0200

Andrew Layman wrote:
> 
> Per the W3C specification for namespaces, the "price" element name in the
> example you cite is an unqualified name.  The XML Schemas specification
> provides for locally scoped names, and also provides that an unqualified
> name may be the expression of a locally scoped name.

Ralph R. Swick has posted an interesting related
message titled "'form' and 'elementFormDefault' 
appear harmful" to rdf-interest. See

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000May/0101.html

Best,

Stefan

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: Namespaces problems (SOAP, ...) and general problem of standard simplicity
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>

• Prev by Date: Website Description Markup
• Next by Date: Re: Storage of XML documents & Learning from history
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespaces problems (SOAP, ...) and general problem of standard simplicity
• Next by thread: Increasing Security with XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread