Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Peter> Peter Murray-Rust <URL:mailto:peter@u...> 0> In article <E12mNIr-0003mH-0K@t...>, Peter 0> wrote: Peter> On occasions in the past I and other members of the list have Peter> urged that replies be only to the list unless requested. This Peter> saves a poster getting two identical replies to a message. Peter> Peter> Is this something that people still care about? Yes. As with newsgroups, it's annoying to send a personal reply to something in one's personal mail, only to discover later when reading the list that it was also sent there. [While we're on etiquette, can I moan about people who start new topics in the middle of existing threads? Messages with completely irrelevant In-Reply-To or References headers often get junked along with their containing thread when people do this. I'm not writing this in response to any particular example; it's something that's bugged me for ages but I didn't want to start a new thread for ;)] -- *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
