• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: 17 May 2000 16:53:12 -0400

Charles Wiltgen <lists@w...> writes:

> (Apologies if this is so simple to be a stupid question!)
> 
> We're using XML in a couple ways in an application we're doing.  Is the
> preferred convention to use .xml as the file suffix, or our own suffix
> depending on the flavor?

There's nothing stupid about this question (unfortunately), because
browsers are already starting to look at XML-related extensions.  For
example, if a file ends with .dtd, MSIE will assign it a MIME type of
text/xml (which means that it will not display because a DTD is not,
in itself, well-formed XML).

If you want browsers to recognize your data as XML and try to display
it with a stylesheet, choose .xml; if not, choose something different.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Proper extension for XML files? (don't laugh!)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Proper extension for XML files? (don't laugh!)
    • From: Charles Wiltgen <lists@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Proper extension for XML files?
• Next by Date: Re: Proper extension for XML files?
• Previous by thread: Re: Proper extension for XML files?
• Next by thread: Re: Proper extension for XML files? (don't laugh!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread