• From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 13:34:31 +1000

At 09:26 17/05/2000, Simon St.Laurent wrote:

>Are folks on this list planning to use XInclude when it arrives?
>
>http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude
>
>Basically, it seems like a replacement for external parsed entities, using
>an XML-based syntax:
>
><sample xmlns:xinclude="...still unspecified...">
>     <xinclude:include href="something.xml"/>
></sample>
>
>It doesn't require use of a doctype declaration, though it does require
>support for namespaces.
>
>So far, it seems to be advancing mostly under the radar, along with XBase,
>a separate XLink spinoff.

No use for me.

It uses namespaces; I use DTDs.

J


-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@s...


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • thoughts on XInclude
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Anyone use Lore XML Database from Stanford ?
• Next by Date: Re: thoughts on XInclude
• Previous by thread: thoughts on XInclude
• Next by thread: Re: thoughts on XInclude
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread