• From: Charles Wiltgen <lists@w...>
• To: <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 14:45:02 -0700

Charles Wiltgen wrote...

> We're using XML in a couple ways in an application we're doing.  Is the
> preferred convention to use .xml as the file suffix, or our own suffix
> depending on the flavor?

Many thanks for the input!  I really enjoy reading the posts on this list,
and some of them are even starting to make sense.   :^)

Section A of <http://www.imc.org/draft-murata-xml> talks about adding "+xml"
to MIME subtypes.  Is there any reason they shouldn't be used for file
extensions as well?  It's no problem on any OSs that I can think of
(except pre-98 versions of Windows, which we're not supporting).

-- 
Charles Wiltgen



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Proper extension for XML files? (don't laugh!)
    • From: Charles Wiltgen <lists@w...>

• Prev by Date: Errata in XHTML 1.0
• Next by Date: Re: Errata in XHTML 1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: Proper extension for XML files? (don't laugh!)
• Next by thread: Re: Parse Error Not Thrown When Expected
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread