• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: Ian Stokes-Rees <ijs@d...>, xml-dev@x...
• Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 13:56:09 -0400

At 06:11 PM 5/19/00 +0100, Ian Stokes-Rees wrote:
>Is there any specification ("official", "proposed" or "defacto") for a
>reduced XML syntax that removed all attributes and only used tags and
>content, but preserved the semantic structure of the original XML?  e.g.:

You might want to take a look at the Minimal XML work of the SML-DEV
mailing list:
http://www.docuverse.com/smldev/minxml.html

It doesn't define the transformation itself, but that would probably be
fairly easy to write.

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
http://www.simonstl.com

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Reduced/Simplified XML
    • From: Ian Stokes-Rees <ijs@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Reduced/Simplified XML
• Next by Date: RE: schemas and namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: Reduced/Simplified XML
• Next by thread: How to get the name of the current element?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread