Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Adreas: Yes, it is allowed. This is really the only way in a DTD to control the exact number of subordinate elements. The following would also be correct: <!ELEMENT C (A, A, A+)> This would ensure that you had to have 3 A's but you could have more. Hope this helps. Betty /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Betty Harvey | Phone: 410-787-9200 FAX: 9830 Electronic Commerce Connection, Inc. | harvey@e... | Washington,DC SGML/XML Users Grp URL: http://www.eccnet.com | http://www.eccnet.com/xmlug/ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/ On Wed, 31 May 2000, Schoedl, Andreas wrote: > Hi, all! > > After searching hours and days I finally give up on what appears to be a > newbie question: > > <!ELEMENT C (A,A)>, is such content model allowed? I ask, because I can > nowhere find the statement that it is forbidden. But I strongly feel that it > should be! > > Whereas <!ELEMENT C (A?,A)> seems to be excluded (XML REC 3.2.1), alas not > _very_ explicitly. > > Is there a document where such cases are explained? > > Any help appreciated. > > Kind regards, > > Andreas > > *************************************************************************** > This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. > To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev > List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > *************************************************************************** > *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
