• From: "Julian Reschke" <reschke@m...>
• To: "Andrew Layman" <andrewl@m...>, <ht@c...>, "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 22:15:48 +0200

Could you please explain what you mean by "very conservative interpretation
of the namespaces spec", and what you plan to change???

jr

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xml-dev@x... [mailto:owner-xml-dev@x...]On Behalf Of
> Andrew Layman
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 9:04 PM
> To: 'ht@c...'; Tim Bray
> Cc: xml-dev@x...; connolly@w...
> Subject: RE: Irony heaped on irony
>
>
> You could also declare the attribute value as fixed, that, too, would make
> IE5 happy.
>
> (By the way, as mentioned in some earlier threads, the IE5 MSXML
> very-conservative interpretation of the namespaces spec, which
> interpretation is the cause of this trouble, will be changed in
> the next rev
> of the parser.)


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: Irony heaped on irony
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Irony heaped on irony
• Next by Date: RE: Irony heaped on irony
• Previous by thread: Re: Irony heaped on irony
• Next by thread: RE: Irony heaped on irony
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread