• From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@a...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 11:54:41 -0500

At 15:26 2000 05 25 +0100, Leigh Dodds wrote:
>> XML 1.0, Second Edition, will incorporate the published errata into
>> the text of the XML Recommendation.  It is not XML 1.1.  It is not
>> considered a substantial change in XML.
>
>Can it be assumed then that the list of possible changes for XML "2nd 
>Edition" is separate to any likely outcome of the discussion playing 
>out on xml-uri?
>
>In other words whats the relationship between the two, if any?

None.  The XML 1.0 Second Edition is just XML 1.0 which is
unaware of namespaces.

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Prev by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by Date: Re: Irony heaped on irony
• Previous by thread: RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread