Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I'd had the same thought as well. ----- Original Message ----- From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@i...> To: 'John Cowan' <cowan@l...> Cc: <xml-editor@w...>; <xml-dev@x...>; <w3t-comm@w...> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 11:59 AM Subject: RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition > > A change to the XML version number would make existing 1.0 XML > > parsers unable to cope. Since we are not making incompatible > > changes, a new version would be inappropriate. > > E62, which requires the separator in Names and NMTOKENS to be a single space > rather than any sequence of whitespace characters, looks like a rather major > incompatibility to me! > > And the only justification given is SGML compatibility, so why on earth > wasn't this made a "for interoperability" rule which most of us can happily > ignore? > > Mike Kay > > *************************************************************************** > This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. > To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev > List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
