Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
We need to start viewing reporters more critically. To say "he's non-technical" is not an excuse, but it is a factor. I've followed PBS and print news reporting of Microsoft issues and most of these journalists barely understand the difference between an application and an operating system, much less what XML is. And many journalists seem to think Microsoft created heaven and earth. I don't know why they think that, but they do. In general, journalists do make mistakes, even misquoting or misrepresenting people and situations. The problems come when people assume that everything journalists write is accurate, and jump to react. We should all be skeptical of what we read & hear even (especially) in mainstream media. Erika >On Mon, 8 May 2000, Andrew Layman wrote: > > > > > In today's Washington Post ... > > > > > > Ballmer hopes to build Microsoft's new identity partly around a > > > > computing language known as XML. Invented several years ago by two > > > > Microsoft technologists, > > > > I've checked. Ballmer never said that. He merely stressed Microsoft's > > early support for XML. The reporter is not a technical guy and he made a > > mistake. > >I appreciate your checking (I imagine we all do), and I'm relieved to >know that Microsoft is not claiming to have invented XML. I'm a little >puzzled by the last sentence, though. What would technical expertise >(or lack of it) have to do with a reporter's responsibility to check the >non-technical facts that he's reporting (such as who, if anyone, >deserves credit for an invention)? > >-- >Bob Kline >mailto:bkline@r... >http://www.rksystems.com erika@s... http://www.seastorm.com *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
