• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>, "xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:12:46 -0400

"Steven R. Newcomb" wrote:

> XLink is going to be a W3C
> Recommendation, and nobody else's.  Its canonical expression must be
> W3C's, and nobody else's.  Formal expressions of it cannot be regarded
> as a reliable basis for open information interchange if they are not
> blessed by the W3C.

I think the W3C would be happy to publish an informative architectural
DTD for XLink, if somebody concocted one.  The definition of XLink
is normative prose, not any kind of formalism.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • XLink a special case in the self-describing Web?
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
  • Re: XLink a special case in the self-describing Web?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: XLink a special case in the self-describing Web?
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
  • Re: XLink a special case in the self-describing Web?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: XLink a special case in the self-describing Web?
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Irony heaped on irony
• Next by Date: RE: Locating schemas (was Re: Irony heaped on irony)
• Previous by thread: Re: XLink a special case in the self-describing Web?
• Next by thread: Re: XLink a special case in the self-describing Web?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread