[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • To: <xml-dev@x...>
  • Date: 10 Apr 2000 20:23:30 -0400

"Don Park" <donpark@d...> writes:

> I would agree with you if it was just the parser and the application
> with nothing in between.  Unfortunately, most e-commerce systems is
> based on N-tier designs with lots of middleware and mediums between
> the data source and the application.  You have to worry, not just
> about the size of the your toilet hole, but all the pipes between
> your home and the sewer plant.  Sorry about my rather yucky
> analogy. <g>

Most e-commerce players are going to use XML only for interchange;
despite the best efforts of self-proclaimed XML vendors, few real
players would be foolish enough to redesign all of their internal
around XML.

That means that you're going to get XML => proprietary internal
storage => XML, where the XML that comes out may or may not bear any
resemblance to the XML that goes in -- elements, attributes, PIs, and
even character data may come out completely transformed (or not at
all), because equivalence will be defined by something other than the
XML markup model.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member