• From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@c...>
• To: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 11:50:16 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> 	- The experts (on this list) cannot agree precisely what 
>         a parser should and should'nt do with various combinations.

Would this be a good use for a feature manifest, listing
those items which *must* be done for an XML document
to be 'successfully' parsed?  Obvious stuff like supporting
attributes could be in there, but more 'obscure' items 
like expanding default attributes should also be included.


Clark 


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml search engine?
• Next by Date: Re: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Previous by thread: RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Next by thread: RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread