• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• To: "David Megginson" <david@m...>, "XML-Dev List" <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 17:54:36 -0400

Hi David,

David said:
The safest approach seems to be to distribute XML documents normalized
(all external general entities expanded and all default attribute
values filled in) and without a DOCTYPE declaration.  Mind you, that
prevents them from being XHTML-conformant...

Didier replies:
Hoops again an other bug in the XHTML specs raised its head :-)). Let's call
that a catch 22 kind of bug. Damm if you do, damm if you don't :-))

cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@n...
Conferences: Web Chicago(http://www.mfweb.com)
             XML Europe (http://www.gca.org)
Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com)
column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com)
Products: http://www.netfolder.com


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Next by Date: Re: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Previous by thread: RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Next by thread: RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread