• From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:31:59 -0400

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> 
> I haven't seen anyone mention this on XML-Dev yet, so you all may want to
> take a look at http://www.jdom.org.
> 
> >While JDOM is 100% compliant with existing standards
> >such as the Simple API for XML (SAX) and the Document Object
> >Model (DOM), it is not an abstraction layer or enhancement
> >to those APIs. Rather, it seeks to provide a robust,
> >light-weight means of reading and writing XML data without
> >the complex and memory-consumptive options that current
> >API offerings provide.
> 
> I've posted a brief story on xmlhack:
> http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=464
> 
> Elliotte Rusty Harold's got some comments at Cafe Con Leche:
> http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/

Arnaud Le Hors's got some comments on the DOM public mailing list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2000AprJun/0090.html

Philippe.

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • JDOM: Alternative to W3C DOM
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: List server: Unusually quiet?
• Next by Date: SAX2/Java: less than a week left for comments
• Previous by thread: JDOM: Alternative to W3C DOM
• Next by thread: XSLT with a longer wire == SOAP?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread