Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 04:11:13PM -0400, David Megginson wrote: > It's hard to think of a good reason for that -- do users really want > libraries poking around inside their implementations? As I said, it was a dumb example. In spirit I agree with your notion that queries should only flow up the chain. If nothing else, it makes it a lot harder to get circular queries going. So, I won't argue with you anymore on that one. > > Another application that would be useful would be querying the > > "parent" of the ContentHandler for its last modification time. > > The parent in which direction? Do you mean the parent in the filter > chain, or the superclass? If you mean the parent in the filter chain, > that *is* allowed in SAX2. Yes, I mean the parent in the filter chain. I may be dense, but I can't really see how a ContentHandler can query its parent in the filter chain. How would that be done? -- _______________________________________________________________________ Ean Schuessler Director of New Products and Technologies Novare International Inc. The Unstoppable Fist of Digital Action --- Some or all of the above signature may be a joke *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
