• From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• To: "Xml-Dev@Xml. Org" <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 10:09:48 +0100

At 09:21 AM 4/17/00 -0400, keshlam@u... wrote:
>
>(Personally, I'd suggest that the discussion be held on a single mailing
>list rather than copied to both, to reduce the risk that a reply might be
>posted to only one and not reach all participants.)
>
I fully agree -  it is an xml-dev tradition that we eliminate almost all
crossposting. It is occasionally necessary and if so, should be accompanied
by a statement that there *is* crossposting and that replied should only be
to one of the lists.

	P.



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: adding addressing capabilities to the DOM
    • From: keshlam@u...

• Prev by Date: RE: Multi-lingual experiment - other languages needed
• Next by Date: Re: Parameterizing namespaces - possible?
• Previous by thread: RE: adding addressing capabilities to the DOM
• Next by thread: Re: adding addressing capabilities to the DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread