• From: Michael Rossi <mrossi@c...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 19:01:17 -0400

Paul Grosso wrote:
> 
> At 13:47 2000 04 17 +0100, Leigh Dodds wrote:
> > <snip/>
> >
> >Isn't this something of a problem? Doesn't the usefulness of 
> >a PI/Catalog mechanism also apply in this case?
> 
> I'm not sure what PIs have to do with this discussion.

   Hi Paul :-). I'm sure she meant Public Identifiers (PIs), not Processing
Instructions (PIs). I used to try to get around this by using FPI for the
former, but they're not always "Formal" - arghh! Maybe we could use FPI
(Formal Public Identifier) and IPI (Informal Public Identifier), to stay
clear of PI (Processing Instruction).

   Did I just say that? :-)

Michael A. Rossi
mailto:mrossi@c...
856-983-4400 x4911

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: External Resources: Catalogs, XInclude, XBase
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute)
• Next by Date: Re: Interesting @ infoworld
• Previous by thread: Re: External Resources: Catalogs, XInclude, XBase
• Next by thread: RE: External Resources: Catalogs, XInclude, XBase
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread