• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 21:04:30 -0400

I posted a bit about Common XML in the Parser Behaviour (serious) thread
yesterday, but at the time it was bits and pieces in various postings.

There's a complete (though rough and unpolished) draft up at:
http://www.simonstl.com/articles/cxmlspec.txt

Comments and suggestions are welcome, though they're probably more
appropriate on SML-DEV (see http://www.egroups.com/group/sml-dev/info.html)
than XML-Dev.

>From the Intro:
>Common XML describes a frequently used and thoroughly reliable 
>subset of the features provided by the XML 1.0 and Namespaces 
>in XML W3C Recommendations.  Common XML defines a very small 
>core, and allows developers to move beyond that core if needed.  
>All of XML 1.0 and Namespaces is still available, though this 
>specification includes descriptions of the impact of features 
>beyond the core on interoperability.

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
http://www.simonstl.com

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Document Feature Requirements [was: Common XML ...]
    • From: Steven Rowe <sarowe@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A call for XML 1.1
• Next by Date: RE: Arbortext makes Java catalog classes available for use by XML processors
• Previous by thread: Didier's labs: experiments with xinclude - corrections
• Next by thread: Document Feature Requirements [was: Common XML ...]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread