• From: James Tauber <JTauber@b...>
• To: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@t...>, xml-dev@X...
• Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 17:22:13 -0400

One of the problems I have with it is that it makes the mistake (as similar
articles do) of confusing XML with a particular vocabulary and seems to
suggest that if a particular XML vocabulary fails, then XML has therefore
failed.

James

> http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,2551691,00.html
> 
> The analysis is kind of dumb, but some of the reportage is 
> worth reading. -T.

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Prev by Date: Re: PC Week on "Why XML is Failing" ?????
• Next by Date: RE: PC Week on "Why XML is Failing" ?????
• Previous by thread: PC Week announces death of XML
• Next by thread: SOAP v1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread