• From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: 12 Apr 2000 22:19:52 GMT

Dylan Walsh <Dylan.Walsh@T...> wrote:

>To quote Southpark, "that's pretty ****ed up right there!". Doesn't this
>pretty much make a joke out of idea that namespace prefixes are arbitrary,
>and all that matters is the namespace URI, if the prefixes are effectively
>hardcoded into the DTD?

Yes, if you use a DTD.  One of the many reasons we need schemas is
to give us something like a DTD that works well with namespaces.

There is a trick of parametrising the namespace prefixes in a DTD
using (surprise) parameter entities, but it's clearly a hack.

-- Richard

-- 
Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers.

"The Internet is really just a series of bottlenecks joined by high
speed networks." - Sam Wilson

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: Namespace question
    • From: Dylan Walsh <Dylan.Walsh@T...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Common XML (was Re: Document Feature Requirements)
• Next by Date: Re: Lightweight XML parser
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespace question
• Next by thread: Quick Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread