• From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...>
• To: aaron@s..., "Xml-Dev@Xml. Org" <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 21:37:04 -0700

Right. Sorry. I was thinking that  Document interface could better place, 
because I thought that it may be easier to extend 'Node'  into XSLT 
'Context', if NodeList getNodes(scheme, expression, currentNode)  
is part of Document, but not part of Node.  I'm not sure. Looks complex.

> If it's added to the Node interface, currentNode is implied.

Rgds.Paul.



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: adding addressing capabilities to the DOM
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Foreign Names
• Next by Date: Re: adding addressing capabilities to the DOM
• Previous by thread: RE: adding addressing capabilities to the DOM
• Next by thread: RE: adding addressing capabilities to the DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread