• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>
• Date: 08 Apr 2000 11:22:10 +0100

Bob Kline <bkline@r...> writes:

> In http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/, section 5.2.12 (and elsewhere in
> the recommendation), I see language which states that the length facet
> specifies the number of octets for binary types.  Section 4.2.1,
> however, says the length for binary datatypes is in bits.  Anyone know
> which is correct?

This was corrected in the draft released yesterday [1]:

  "If {base type definition} is binary, then the length of the value, as
   measured in octets of the binary data, is equal to {value};"

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#dc-length
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • SCHEMA: length for binary datatypes
    • From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
• Next by Date: Re: Document Feature Requirements [was: Common XML ...]
• Previous by thread: SCHEMA: length for binary datatypes
• Next by thread: [ANN] First release of Minimal XML (aka SML) parser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread