• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>, "Clark C. Evans" <cce@c...>, "Peter Murray-Rust" <peter@u...>
• Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:25:58 -0400

At 10:57 AM 4/6/00 -0400, Frank Boumphrey wrote:
>Nice, but  practically I don't see W3C doing ANYTHING to make it easier to
>use or extend the life of DTD's, so it would have to be in a separate
>processing instruction.


More than that, there's this bit from the W3C Recommendation _Associating
Stylesheets with XML Documents_:

>The W3C does 
>not anticipate recommending the use of processing instructions in any future 
>specification."

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
http://www.simonstl.com

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
    • From: "Michael Champion" <Mike.Champion@s...>
  • Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• References:
  • Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
    • From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@c...>
  • Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
    • From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage
• Next by Date: Re: SAX Namespaces? ContentHandlers? Jobs.
• Previous by thread: Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
• Next by thread: Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread