• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• To: "gopi" <gopi@a...>, <n.vinokurov@m...>
• Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:30:30 -0500

HI Gopi

Gopi said:
	No, No.  you are bringing it back to same position where we started:-) .
See the main reason why we should define standard APIs for xml storage is to
isolate "vendor" specific implementation of xml storage from accessing xml
data.

Didier replies:
I see your point. So why don't we do like the SVG people did with an SVGDOM
and have an information set engine DOM then.

Cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@n...
Conferences: Web Chicago(http://www.mfweb.com)
             XML Europe (http://www.gca.org)
Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com)
column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com)
Products: http://www.netfolder.com


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Prev by Date: Re: Unicode
• Next by Date: XPath and DOM (was RE: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage)
• Previous by thread: RE: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage
• Next by thread: Re: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread