• From: "Anders W. Tell" <anderst@t...>
• To: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
• Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 16:43:49 +0100

Miles Sabin wrote:

> The critical issue for any RPC mechanism whatsoever (SOAP,
> IIOP, RMI, DCOM etc.) is that, unlike local calls, remote calls
> can fail. That means there'll always be a conflict between
> transparency (making remote calls look like local calls) and
> recoverability (dealing with network failures *as* network
> failures rather than as failures at the application-level).
>
> FWIW I don't think anybody knows how to address this problem
> yet ... tho' some of the things that the Aspect Oriented
> Programming people are doing look promising. SOAP, to it's
> credit, doesn't seem to be pushing too hard in the transparency
> direction ... I think that's probably the right choice.

Have a look my short XIOP paper
 <http://xiop.sourceforge.net/doc/xioprationale_1_2.html#ByScale>
for few ideas on the subject, of course within the Corba framework.

IMHO all object interactions should be first class considerations for any
developer,
i.e.. failures in interactions
(inprocess,inter-thread,inter-process,inter-machine)
should be separated from other types of exceptions. In other words I don't
want complete transparency.


Regards
/anders
--
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
/  Financial Toolsmiths AB  /
/  Anders W. Tell           /
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: XML over HTTP: SOAP and ...?
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Id vs. ID in SAX
• Next by Date: Re: XML over HTTP: SOAP and ...?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML over HTTP: SOAP and ...?
• Next by thread: RE: XML over HTTP: SOAP and ...?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread