Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Brownell writes:
> If you care about which parser you get, then ask for it. Else
> you asked for a default, and you got one. Anyone who can control
> a system property can do the same to a class path, but the converse
> isn't true. Software setting up a controlled environment for running
> components (a preferred model) will assemble it at runtime using
> class loader primitives and such, but can't set system properties
> differently.
So what you want, I think, is simply a statement to the effect that
it's OK to build your own XMLReaderFactory with the same class name
and shadow the existing one? I don't see any harm, but is that the
kind of thing that needs to be mentioned explicitly?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@m...
http://www.megginson.com/
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
