[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Ann Navarro wrote: > > So, if I don't use your vocabulary, I'm incompatible? > > XML, in good part, is about *not needing* to pick one single way to do > things. You don't need to have people declaring 'best viewed in X browser' > any longer. > > There's nothing incompatible nor non-interoperable about well-formed and > valid XML. XML cannot fix the "best viewed in X browser" problem. That is as much a problem of different frameworks as markup. Well-formed and valid XML is a syntax and a namespace; not more or less. The promise of interoperability and compatibility requires an architecture with well-defined semantics and testable conformance. len *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|

Cart



