[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • To: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 20:39:31 -0600

Ann Navarro wrote:
> 
> So, if I don't use your vocabulary, I'm incompatible?
> 
> XML, in good part, is about *not needing* to pick one single way to do
> things. You don't need to have people declaring 'best viewed in X browser'
> any longer.
> 
> There's nothing incompatible nor non-interoperable about well-formed and
> valid XML.

XML cannot fix the "best viewed in X browser" problem.  That is as 
much a problem of different frameworks as markup.   Well-formed 
and valid XML is a syntax and a namespace; not more or less.  The 
promise of interoperability and compatibility requires an architecture 
with well-defined semantics and testable conformance.

len


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member