• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: "'Henry S. Thompson'" <ht@c...>
• Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 19:13:53 -0800

>I chose leading "." precisely _because_ it violates 1.0.  That means
>if my proposed change is introduced in 1.1, it does not change the
>interpretation of any existing well-formed XML.

So XML 1.0 files will be read in correctly by XML 1.1 parsers
but XML 1.1 files will be rejected by XML 1.0 parsers.  I do
not see how this would work particularly when web browser
upgrade cycle influences heavily on the XML industry.  I wish
XML-ready web browsers had auto-update for their XML support.

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Re: Structured attributes
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: [ANN] Temporary, unofficial mailing list for XSL library project
• Next by Date: RE: Fixing XML-DEV (was RE: State of the art in listserves)
• Previous by thread: Re: Structured attributes
• Next by thread: Re: Structured attributes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread