[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote, > It's not an arbitrary change. There's a specific reason for > it. But it's not a good reason. Java has packages to deal with this issue and people should learn how to use them. A good reason might be: it's a lousy name that doesn't fit in that well with other standard java event mechanisms. I might just about buy this line, but I can't say I'd be all that desperate for a change. I guess my favoured options would be along the lines of, ContentHandler -> ContentListener XMLReader -> XMLEventSource Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin Cromwell Media Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews +44 (0)20 8817 4030 London, W6 0LJ, England msabin@c... http://www.cromwellmedia.com/ *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|

Cart



