• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 13:12:38 -0500 (EST)

David Brownell writes:

 > I don't know about configuration file, but it does seem
 > appropriate to say that every SAX parser should come with
 > basic documentation including:
 > 
 > 	- SAX2 features/modes supported
 > 	- default settings for those modes
 > 	- SAX2 properties supported
 > 
 > Of course I think conformance statements for XML would
 > be appropriate too.

I agree with all of this, but I'm not sure how to enforce it.  Would
community pressure be enough?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: Ken MacLeod <ken@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2 Event Sequence [Was: Re: SAX2: relative ordering ofstartDocument() & startDTD() events?]
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by thread: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread