Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Ann Navarro writes: > The TEI DTDs were evaluated, and felt not to suit the project well, > so they're building their own. Perfectly 'legal', and supportable. > No need for people to get their knickers in a twist over it, > by a long shot. I think what bothers me about all this is the apparent imprimatur approval of OASIS for the work. Of course anyone can do what they want, but I think a standards-based group like OASIS has a different duty. Which was I was curious to see the detailed technical report showing why the long-standing `standard' DTD for text encoding, the TEI, was not being used for the project. I am sorry, but the answers have been interesting, but pretty much anecdotal and sometimes simplistic. If you want to tell me that a) I have completely misremembered, and OASIS has nothing to do with this, or b) its none of my business, thats OK too..... Sebastian Rahtz *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
