Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jon Ferraiolo wrote: >As I remember, we decided against a syntax with coordinates as >character data because we wanted character data only for things >that were textual in nature (such as <text> elements). Now this is interesting. Do you recall WHY the WG wanted to use character data only for things that were textual in nature? I am not being critical here. I just sense a gem of wisdom I do not yet have. I am intrigued. >These comments have been made in the desire to be candid and >truthful about what is likely to happen. Would you prefer instead >that I set up expectations incorrectly, or perhaps that the >comments were left unanswered? No. I am not placing the blame on you. I am disappointed with the likely turn of events you are predicting. Your responses are appreciated still. >I do not recall any feedback comments to the first last call about >the 'path' element. I accept my share of the blame. Like everyone else, I was (and am) under an endless avalanche of specs to read. Best, Don Park - mailto:donpark@d... Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
