• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 15:06:33 -0800

At 05:40 PM 3/6/00 -0500, Frank Boumphrey wrote:
>The thing that suprised me was how few naked pitches there were! In fact the
>academic quality of the papers was extreamly hgh.

BTW, the conference organizers had no problem with people doing naked
pitches, provided only that some new technology was being shown for the
first time.  

Actually, I wouldn't have minded seeing a few more commercial rollouts
coming off the stage. 

Having said that, Frank was right; both the intensity and quality were
pleasingly high. -Tim

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Random XTech observations
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What is wrong with SVG?
• Next by Date: RE: What is wrong with SVG?
• Previous by thread: Re: Random XTech observations
• Next by thread: RE: Random XTech observations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread