[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • To: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 06:18:50 -0500 (EST)

David Brownell writes:

 > >  > At this point my preferred resolution would be to say (a) PE
 > >  > inclusion MUST NOT be reported, (b) declarations in the DTD may be
 > >  > reported in any order.  I could go either way on (b) but it seems
 > >  > least trouble overall.
 > >
 > > I'd love (b) as well.
 > 
 > Then let's consider (b) resolved for SAX2.

Not so simple -- if there's going to be a record of the internal
vs. external subset, then we either need to add an isInternal flag to
each declaration or at least partition the declarations into two
groups (which is a very rudimentary ordering).


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member