• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@X...>
• Date: 10 Mar 2000 09:53:09 +0000

Ray Whitmer <ray@x...> writes:

> Perhaps I missed something, but would this type of value become shredded if 
> you save canonical XML, which reassigns all the prefixes but presumably 
> does not know about namespaces in values represented by prefixes?
> 
> Is that a problem?

That's one reason XML Schema provides a QName simple type definition,
so you can identify such attributes.  This won't help XPath, because
the whole attribute is not a QName, but rather may contain them.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Re: namespace prefixes within attribute values
    • From: Ray Whitmer <ray@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: 25 Feb Structures Questions
• Next by Date: Re: namespace prefixes within attribute values
• Previous by thread: Re: namespace prefixes within attribute values
• Next by thread: RE: namespace prefixes within attribute values
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread