Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> The "Executive Summary of Requirements" notes "Flexibility, extensibility, > and distribution," but appears to have entirely forgotten simplicity. I personally don't find RDF at all complex. The specification is clear and well written, and there isn't all that much syntax needed. I didn't find the schema document particularly complex either, although you have to be willing to read specs. There did seem to be an error --an RDF example uses s.Creator, where s is the rdf schema spec. Should be dc.Creator I think. Luckily there are quite a few people using RDF now, so there is implementation experience as well as large amounts of actual data. Lee -- Liam Quin, Barefoot Computing, Toronto; The barefoot agitator www.holoweb.net/~liam/ irc.sorcory.net/Ankh [www.valinor.sorcery.net] co-author, The XML Specification Guide... l i a m at h o l o w e b dot n e t *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
