• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 16:00:35 -0500 (EST)

Bill dehOra writes:

 > Suggestion. Retain the name and document the potential conflict in the
 > interface. 

Suggestion accepted -- I've added it to the TODO list.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: org.xml.sax.ContentHandler conflicts with java.net.ContentHan dler
    • From: Bill dehOra <Wdehora@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Thoughts on the SML-DEV presentation
• Next by Date: Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
• Previous by thread: RE: org.xml.sax.ContentHandler conflicts with java.net.ContentHan dler
• Next by thread: Re: 25 Feb Structures Comments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread