• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Jean Marc VANEL <jean-marc_vanel@e...>
• Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 17:15:13 -0600

Jean Marc VANEL wrote:
> 
> I more than agree with you about modular schemas versus monolythic Schemas. X3D is a very "good" example of monolythic thing that I studied, but I think that most e-commerce Schemas are like that.

Ummm.... X3D?  That is an XML application language for VRML.  

It is only monolithic currently.  It will be modularized and 
in fact, has to be to support the core.

It is the competitor to SVG.

len



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: XML Schemas: lost "open content models"?
    • From: "Jean Marc VANEL" <jean-marc_vanel@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by Date: Re: In praise of SVG
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Schemas: lost "open content models"?
• Next by thread: "SAX2 Namespace Support" Configuration Example
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread