• From: Jim Layer <JBLayer@n...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: 24 Feb 00 15:21:54 EST

> David Megginson wrote:
> That's not a good parallel, though, because there's always only one
> java.lang.System class in any given Java installation (as far as I
> know) -- on the other hand, if I install a future version of both
> IBM's XML4J and James Clark's XP (for example) into the same Java
> installation, then I would get two different versions of
> org.xml.sax.helpers.XMLReaderFactory and whichever happens to be first
> on the classpath will always get hit.

Similar behavior with Miles' stuff - no validation requested and first one
in line wins.

Maybe need a test for http://org.brownell.xml.conformance >= 1050 <grin/>

Regards,

Jim Layer


____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• Prev by Date: RE: A certain difficulty
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by thread: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread