Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
THOMAS PASSIN wrote: > (...) > > Using OOP to build an application does not automatically require that every > piece of the schema be an OOP object. That might or might not be a useful > approach. An XML document may be used in a large number of ways, requiring > different methods. So I don't think that the WD is headed in the wrong > direction here. While I agree to your statement, I do not understand the conclusion: Wouldn't a simplified XML Schena spec help all processors, regardless if they are OOP or not? Or do you see a concrete advantage of the type/element distinction in your application field? Best regards Stefan -- SAX-based access to WBXML and WML: http://www.trantor.de/wbxml XML pull parser: http://www.trantor.de/xml *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html ***************************************************************************
|
