• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: Stefan Haustein <stefan.haustein@t...>
• Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 18:26:12 -0800

Stefan Haustein wrote:
> 
> Terje Norderhaug wrote:
> > At 4:46 AM 2/5/00, Stefan Haustein wrote:
> > > Terje Norderhaug wrote:
> 
> > >> I suggest that parsers interns each name as a separate string in the
> > >> namespace it belong to. ...
>
> would expect that both strings are java-interned. Also, you
> would not be able to compare just against a constant.

It'd be 'string.equals', the pricey one.  The work to keep track
of the appropriately interned strings would be too subtle to keep
right in most systems.  For starters, if I've got two subsystems
spitting out names, how can they coordinate to use the same pool
of interned names for each namespace??  Yeech.

I'd vote against this namespace-specific interning.

- Dave

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX2: Interning names in namespaces
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@m...>

• References:
  • Re: SAX2: Interning names in namespaces
    • From: terje@i... (Terje Norderhaug)
  • Re: SAX2: Interning names in namespaces
    • From: Stefan Haustein <stefan.haustein@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX2: Interning names in namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2: relative ordering of startDocument() & startDTD() events?
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: Interning names in namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2: Interning names in namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread