• From: "James Duncan Davidson" <james.davidson@e...>
• To: <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 16:41:36 -0800

> How about calling it something like "XMLParser" or "XMLScanner" that
> does not have any preexisting connotations in most programmers' minds?
> I'm not perfectly happy with these suggested names, and hope somebody
> has a better idea, but I do think that "XMLReader" is a mistake.

I don't have any better suggestions, but agree that "XMLReader" is a
dangerous name to use. It implies that I can use it like any other
java.io.Reader instance, which of course I can't.

.duncan

----------------------------------------------------------------------
James Duncan Davidson                               duncan@e...
Java + XML / Portable Code + Portable Data                 !try; do();


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • SAX2: Is XMLReader a bad name?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: In praise of SVG
• Next by Date: Re: A certain difficulty
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: Is XMLReader a bad name?
• Next by thread: XML Schemas: lost "open content models"?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread